Whistleblowing since May, 2017
Part of the
Civil Complaint
KC-2018-0636
KC-2018-0636
The following are excerpts from the actual Civil Complaint (KC-2018-0636) filed in Kent County Superior Court.
Documents filed in civil cases are open to the public. You can access them by clicking this link:
or by contacting hawkoutsider@gmail.com.
The Hawk Outsider Network
The Hawk Outsider Network is a collaborative effort involving three distinct and separate entities:
The Hawk Outsider, Hendricken Parents, and Hendricken Alumni. Each individual group is wholly
responsible for any and all information, evidence, images, audio, video, posts, and tweets presented
on its respective website, Facebook page, or Twitter feed. Furthermore, any and all specific claims, allegations, or implications made are solely the responsibility of the group from which they originate
and cannot be attributed to another group. The three organizations are linked here merely for
convenience, and each group's webpage is monitored and maintained by its own administrator.
Any comments, suggestions, or complaints should be sent via the contact information for that
specific page. Copyright © 2017-2018, The Hawk Outsider Network. All rights reserved.
The Hawk Outsider, Hendricken Parents, and Hendricken Alumni. Each individual group is wholly
responsible for any and all information, evidence, images, audio, video, posts, and tweets presented
on its respective website, Facebook page, or Twitter feed. Furthermore, any and all specific claims, allegations, or implications made are solely the responsibility of the group from which they originate
and cannot be attributed to another group. The three organizations are linked here merely for
convenience, and each group's webpage is monitored and maintained by its own administrator.
Any comments, suggestions, or complaints should be sent via the contact information for that
specific page. Copyright © 2017-2018, The Hawk Outsider Network. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use
& Legal Disclaimer
& Legal Disclaimer
[Plaintiff] . . . demonstrated that Bishop Hendricken High School: (1) refused to investigate whether a teacher at the high school was using one
of the school's classroom computers, which was available to the students, and its network, to seek paid and unpaid sexual encounters through internet sites,
which may have involved the teacher sending one or more pictures of Bishop Hendricken High School students and (2) had engaged in a cover-up of its failure to investigate and, if necessary, to take prompt appropriate remedial action to address the situation with this teacher. Shortly after he showed the evidence to the Warwick Police Department, Defendants terminated his employment with it.
of the school's classroom computers, which was available to the students, and its network, to seek paid and unpaid sexual encounters through internet sites,
which may have involved the teacher sending one or more pictures of Bishop Hendricken High School students and (2) had engaged in a cover-up of its failure to investigate and, if necessary, to take prompt appropriate remedial action to address the situation with this teacher. Shortly after he showed the evidence to the Warwick Police Department, Defendants terminated his employment with it.
Case Number: KC-2018-0636 (Excerpts)
Filed in Kent County Superior Court
Filed in Kent County Superior Court
It was Plaintiff's understanding that the computer could be used as part of an investigation of the teacher for soliciting sex on school computers
and other possible violations, and the possible harm viewing this material could have on students.
and other possible violations, and the possible harm viewing this material could have on students.
§ 1
§ 50
Plaintiff had now understood that both Hendricken High School . . . and the Diocese of Providence, through Chaplain Murphy and Monsignor Kenney, had ordered Plaintiff to participate in a cover-up of the teacher's potentially illegal use of a school computer and the potential threat that this teacher's activities may pose to the students of Hendricken High School.
§ 47 - 48
Father Murphy told Plaintiff that he would arrange a meeting between Plaintiff and a high-ranking official with the Diocese of Providence, Monsignor
Albert Kenney, who is a Chancellor in the Diocese of Providence. However, shortly after Plaintiff and Chaplain Murphy had this discussion in theSpring of 2016, Chaplain Murphy told Plaintiff that Monsignor Kenney had said to "drop it."
Albert Kenney, who is a Chancellor in the Diocese of Providence. However, shortly after Plaintiff and Chaplain Murphy had this discussion in theSpring of 2016, Chaplain Murphy told Plaintiff that Monsignor Kenney had said to "drop it."
§ 39 - 40
Plaintiff understood this to mean that the Chaplain had requested that Plaintiff should continue to investigate whether this teacher was continuing to use
this Hendricken High School classroom computer for improper explicit sexual discussions and/or to attempt to arrange sexual contacts, when the material
could be viewed by students who were using this available computer. Plaintiff complied with Farther Murphy's request and began periodically checking the
contents of the computer and examining its browsing history.
this Hendricken High School classroom computer for improper explicit sexual discussions and/or to attempt to arrange sexual contacts, when the material
could be viewed by students who were using this available computer. Plaintiff complied with Farther Murphy's request and began periodically checking the
contents of the computer and examining its browsing history.
§ 28
